Countries
Emmaus Campus: young people take centre stage!
European young people are increasingly affected by precariousness and the Emmaus movement is seeking ways to meet their needs. This idea also involves reviewing our practices to allow young activists to join us. In Paris, the Emmaus Défi group is trying to meet this twofold challenge by creating Emmaus Campus, a young and inspiring integration project! We met Mederic, its director:
Can you tell us why Emmaus Défi came up with the idea of setting up Campus?
In 2020, Emmaus Défi made three observations:
- We were at maximum capacity in our current premises, with 150 employees on work integration schemes… and yet, similarly to all the other Emmaus groups, a large number of people were still knocking on our door and we were unable to help them.
- The precariousness of young people has doubled over the last twenty years and was further exacerbated in the wake of the COVID crisis. The Emmaus movement was only partially able to address this issue.
- Young people are increasingly keen to get involved, but we have not geared our welcoming and volunteering methods to suit them.
Through the creation of Emmaus Campus, Emmaus Défi aimed to set up a scheme that would address these three issues.
How does it work specifically?
Emmaus Campus carries out “classic” Emmaus group activities. It runs a work integration project that supports people experiencing job insecurity by offering solidarity-based work involving the collection, sorting and sale of second-hand items. We simply tried to add a youth dimension to every aspect of our work:
- We welcome a higher proportion of young people among our employees, in order to meet our target of ¾ under the age of 30.
- We set up our shops near universities or places where young people gather, such as the campus at the Sorbonne Nouvelle faculty, or Forum des Halles shopping centre.
- We regularly organise pop-up sales on campuses and at universities.
- We offer special sales and discounts in our shops to enable young people to buy articles at low prices (-30% for under 30s).
- We organise solidarity donations of clothes for students facing hardship.
- We welcome a lot of interns and have launched “Pass Campus”, a voluntary scheme for young people.
- By the end of the year, we will initiate “inser-jeunes”: a mobile team made up of 100% employees under 30 on integration schemes, who will receive appropriate support and carry out collection, sales, awareness-raising and distribution activities in student settings.
What advice would you give to other groups in Europe who would like to set up a similar activity?
Go for it! The starting point is actually fairly straightforward. You just need to tailor your current activities to a specific group of people, with particular needs and constraints. Start by listening: what do they need and want? In terms of your group’s current work, what is preventing them from becoming potential volunteers or beneficiaries?
It seems obvious, but the challenge of welcoming young people in our groups is absolutely vital for the future of our movement. It’s an enormous source of creativity and energy that we cannot do without!
We could, and should, come up with many different types of Emmaus groups, tailored to specific groups of people, focussing on the most vulnerable and people whose needs we are not yet fully addressing. Emmaus for seniors, Emmaus for single-parent families, Emmaus for people with disabilities, etc. This would enable us to become even more inclusive and to really welcome everyone.
Credit: Emmaus Campüs
Credit: Emmaus International.
UK-Rwanda deal scrapped
Emmaus welcomes the decision, but warns about the proliferation of this type of agreement impacting the rights of migrants in Europe.
The new UK Prime Minister has scrapped the deal to deport some asylum seekers to Rwanda, following the Labour Party’s victory in the 4 July 2024 General Election. Emmaus is pleased about this decision, as it stops a dangerous agreement that would violate human rights from coming into force. However, the growing number of such agreements across Europe is concerning.
The UK Parliament adopted the Safety of Rwanda Bill on 23 April. Rishi Sunak’s government ignored the appeals made by civil society organisations, Lords and even UN experts, as well as circumventing the opinion expressed by the country’s Supreme Court (the court unanimously ruled that the Rwanda deal was “illegal” on 15 November 2023), in order to implement an agreement enabling the UK to deport to Rwanda people who arrived in the UK without authorisation. Emmaus is delighted that this plan has been axed.
However, we wish to sound the alarm about the rising number of agreements of this type. The Rwanda deal is in keeping with a dynamic similar to that which led to other agreements being adopted, such as the 6 November 2023 Italy-Albania deal. This deal allows Italy to outsource to Albania the processing of asylum applications submitted by some foreign nationals picked up or rescued at sea by the Italian authorities.
This trend is particularly worrying as 15 EU Member States[1] have asked the European Commission to adopt a similar mechanism in Europe. In a letter dated 15 May, these States went as far as suggesting a revision of the “safe third country” concept in order to further restrict migrants’ guaranteed rights. This adds to the legislative framework already applied by many Member States to prevent, whatever the cost, people from moving around and settling in their territory, demonstrating an increasing disregard for human rights.
The European Pact on Migration and Asylum adopted on 14 May is not an exception to this rule, as it openly seeks to speed up the removal of people in irregular situations and increase outsourcing of border control. Security and removal mechanisms, rather than actual reception and solidarity mechanisms, are increasingly holding sway in the Rwanda and Albania deals, and in the EU Pact. Motivated by short-term electioneering, the States are totally ignoring the lived experiences of migrants and their supporters, and are deploying policies that exclude, dehumanize, and make migrants vulnerable. Far from the advocated sharing of responsibility, successive legislative instruments are increasingly contravening international agreements and rights that the States have pledged to respect.
At a time when the European elections have led to a worrying rise of the far right, the current trend of isolationism combined with an increase in the number of authoritarian and conservative governments should be a serious warning.
The Emmaus Movement has member organisations in 43 countries, including 21 European and nine African countries, and brings to life the principles of solidarity, and shelter and support, on a daily basis. Depending on the local context, these principles may take the form of providing proper shelter and support for people who have migrated in search of a better life, as well as running social and income-generating activities involving the most socially-excluded people, enabling them to have decent living conditions, wherever they are. Emmaus champions freedom of movement and settlement for all, but also works on a daily basis to ensure that people have the prospect of a decent life wherever Emmaus is located.
These deals are in keeping with a continuum of agreements that push back Europe’s borders a little further, while viewing human lives as a bargaining chip. We refuse to stay silent in the face of these illegal agreements that threaten the integrity of migrants who are only asking for the freedom to move around, just like any human being.
Emmaus International and Emmaus Europe are calling for the following measures to be implemented:
- Compliance with the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Geneva Convention.
- Abolition of the policy of outsourcing border control.
- A return to a proper visa policy.
- Migrant detention to be scrapped.
We are calling for alternative global migration governance, based on respect for fundamental rights and the principle of universal citizenship!
[1] Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Estonia, Greece, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Netherlands, Austria, Poland and Romania.
Traceability: a strategic asset for Emmaus initiatives?
Increasingly in Europe, politicians are aiming to introduce a system of extended producer responsibility (EPR) to manage waste and promote reuse in different sectors, such as electronics, textiles and furniture. In practice, this means that manufacturers of new products will become financially responsible for managing the products at the end of their lifecycle. As a result, our Emmaus groups can get involved and benefit from funding or facilities for our work thanks to the traceability system.
To find out more, we met Elsa Delouche, Traceability and Reuse Officer at Emmaus France. Elsa supports groups towards establishing the traceability of donations.
Could you tell us what traceability is and what types of “products” it applies to?
Definitions are varied, but the one I use, on which there seems to be a consensus, is as follows: an organisation system and tools that allow us to obtain data on activities, an efficient process (simple, accessible and stable).
In certain sectors, the data is expected by eco-organisations*, and provides access to different opportunities (financial support, free return of waste, access to deposits). In France (and shortly in all EU countries), this will apply to furniture and furnishings, toys and games, DIY and garden equipment, household appliances, sports and leisure goods, along with textiles, bedding and footwear.
What is the purpose of traceability for Emmaus groups?
I see traceability as an opportunity for groups and the movement:
- It encourages us to improve working conditions by questioning the tools used, workstation safety and ergonomics.
- It allows people to diversify their tasks (for example, using weighing equipment).
- It encourages people to develop their skills (e.g. mastering software).
- It contributes to steering the business and decision-making by providing objective, reliable data.
- It enables us to promote our activities in the field to external stakeholders and partners, and to ensure that they are aware of the volume of donations received and processed.
- It confirms Emmaus’ position in the reuse sector through reliable, quantitative data, fuelling the advocacy work carried out by Emmaus France and Emmaus Europe.
How and why was traceability introduced in our groups? How do the groups use it and what work does it entail?
The Emmaus France Federation promotes the freedom of groups to decide whether to introduce traceability or not. Its mission is to raise awareness among groups so that they can make an informed choice (the benefits or otherwise that they could enjoy). Furthermore, it encourages each group to define its own method, it does not advocate a single method. As a result, a wide variety of practices can be observed today:
- On the choice of sectors tracked: track all sectors or select a few (often depending on the effort/gain ratio).
- Regarding the method chosen: weighing? Counting? By combining both depending on the sector?
- In terms of tools: paper materials? Software? A combination of both?
Traceability does not necessarily entail additional work; it all depends on the method and tools chosen by the group. Similarly, it is not a question of creating new tasks or developing our traditional reuse activities. The aim is to find a system to collect data on the key stages of our activity, collecting it during the activity, and then finding the tools to make it easier to use the data.
In our group, we have always believed that it was very important to be able to provide reliable data about what we do with the waste we manage. We see this as an obligation to the public and to the public and private entities that place their trust in us to collect and manage waste.There are an increasing number of obligations to ensure the traceability of the waste we manage. For calls for tender launched by public authorities for the collection of textiles this is compulsory, and current legislation is increasing the obligations of waste managers.
For the past four years, we have been processing environmental documents electronically with public authorities. Today, a waste treatment contract must be signed with the entity generating the waste in order to collect it with our lorries, and we must have an identification document in the collection vehicle.
In addition, in the case of hazardous waste, we have to prepare a consignment note for each type of waste to be transported (each code requires a different consignment note). This notification enables us to draw up the documents to be carried by the lorry transporting the hazardous waste.
The requirements of European regulations and the presence of SCRAP (Scrap metal) mean that this issue will be essential in meeting the needs of public administrations and community systems, as well as public demand for information.
* In France (under the “polluter pays” principle) this is the name given to organisations that are financed by manufacturers to take care of managing the end-of-life of the equipment they put on the market.
Traceability at Emmaus Défi (France). Credit: Emmaus Europe.
Source: Provided by Verian for the European Parliament. Credit: European Parliament.
A worrying shift to the right for the future of Europe and Emmaus
On 9 June 2024, Europeans headed to the ballot boxes to elect their MEPs for the next five years. The results are clear: the conservative right has been significantly strengthened and the far right has gained ground. In contrast, all of the left-wing parties have lost seats, with the green parties hardest hit with a loss of 19 seats.
Within our movement, we firmly believe in a greener, more supportive and inclusive Europe. However, depending on the composition of future alliances between political groups, these choices may jeopardise our efforts to build a fairer society.
An alarming surge by the far right
In France, Italy, Austria and Hungary, far-right parties came out on top in the elections. In other countries, such as Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Belgium, the Czech Republic and Latvia, they took second place.
At the European level, there are two far-right parties (ID and ECR), which obtained a total of 141 out of 720 seats. Although they have not yet formed an alliance, this option cannot be ruled out. These two parties are now the third and fifth most represented in the European Parliament. However, together they would constitute the second largest political force. In addition, around 90 elected MEPs have not yet joined political parties. Although these MEPs are currently unaffiliated, they broadly identify with far-right ideas.
The far right’s agenda is clearly the opposite of ours when it comes to Emmaus’ issues: putting the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum back on the table to make it even more restrictive for potential migrants, challenging the Green Pact and reducing pressure on Vladimir Putin.
A major strengthening of the European right
The major winners of these elections are without a doubt the members of the political group of the European conservative right (EPP). With a minimum of 190 out of 720 seats, they now form the largest political group in the European Parliament. The message sent to Europe is clear in terms of this party’s priorities: putting growth and a competitive economy first, focusing on insecurity, less attention on the environment and little focus on social issues.
A glimmer of hope?
In the Netherlands, although the far right won the general election at the start of the year, the alliance of social democrat and green groups came out on top at the European elections. In Finland, the far right only won a single seat and were ranked sixth, despite their presence in government. In Portugal, the social democrats dominated the elections, with the far right only winning two seats out of twenty-one. In Sweden, the social democrats took first place, relegating the far right to fourth position, with only three seats out of twenty-one. In Denmark, the social democrats and greens came top, while the far right finished in fifth place with a single seat.
Awaiting the formation of alliances and nominations for top jobs
MEPs must now form political groups before the next plenary session of the European Parliament which will be held on 16 July. On this occasion, they will choose the theme-based committees on which they will sit.
The European heads of state are expected to present their candidate for the presidency of the European Commission at the plenary on 28 July. It will be up to Members of Parliament to decide whether or not to validate this choice.
Once elected, the president will have the task of composing the College of Commissioners, made up of 27 commissioners appointed by the Member States, one from each country. The European Parliament will have the opportunity to hold hearings with its future commissioners and is expected to vote on whether or not to approve this choice in October.
The outgoing commission president, Ursula Von der Leyen, is in the running to be re-elected. Although she comes from the ranks of the EPP conservative right, she supported the Green Pact at a time when parties supporting environmental issues were a more significant political force. Will she turn her back on these issues given the new composition of Parliament?
